Showing posts with label Movie Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie Reviews. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Austen Challenge


A challenge to watch or read six Austen related items in the next six months? Yes please! Head on over to The Written Word to follow along!

I have already started and behold, my reviews of two versions of Persuasion (my favorite book of Austen behind Pride and Prejudice) and watched with my sister Heather.

I adore the 1995 version of Persuasion with Amanda Root and Ciaran Hinds. It is practically a perfect adaptation and my love for it probably taints my review of the newer version. Well, too bad. The acting in the 1995 version is wonderful - particularity Anne's sister Mary (who, I had no idea was played by Emma Thompson's younger sister). Actually, it is hard to single anyone out, I loved them all. I love the relationship built between Anne and Admiral and Mrs. Croft. I love Captain Wentworth and the scene where he helps her into the carriage. I love his stature which perfectly matches the description in the book.


Most of all, I love Anne. I love how she plays her - so quiet and yet strong and the scene at the end where she looks up at him and they just know is sigh-inducing. I love this version. Go buy it.


It's easier to tell you why I don't care for the newer version. First of all, who styled Anne's hair?! It is atrocious - almost as bad as Keira Knightly's short hair in the back poking out from under her wig in P&P! The greasy little wispy things stuck to Anne's forehead are just terrible and they never get better. The camera running after her as she races through the house in the opening scene made me a bit nauseous (and what is with the servant standing in the hall holding an ink pot?) I did not like the way Anne kept looking into the camera. Just. stop.


Captain Wentworth was too handsome in this film (or maybe I just never bought their attraction?) and every time I saw Mr. Elliot I kept thinking of Buffy and Giles. Not his fault, I'm just saying. Both Mr Elliot and Mary were meaner in this version.


The whole movie was too short to really build up any of the relationships and the whole discussion about men and women and who loves longest is held out of Wentworth's hearing, which causes the ending make no sense, but my biggest problem was that I never warmed up to Anne in this version. The running scene at the end seemed completely out of character and the relationship with her school friend too rushed. Also, the kiss at the end had to be one of the most awkward things I have ever seen! Why was she gaping with her mouth open like a goldfish? Was she trying to bite him?


Not a lot of love for this movie though I find that I have to watch it after watching the older version and then I am reminded of how much I disliked it and then I have to cleans my mind by watching the older version again. It is a viscous cycle.


More Austen? Yes, please.

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Gaskell's North and South

My sister Heather was in town this past week and besides seeing the sights in the Twin Cities, we spent several evenings and afternoons immersed in period dramas.

I have owned North and South since Mother's Day, but did not watch it until this week. WHY?!


The movie starts in the lush, green English countryside, but very quickly moves to the industrial town of Milton. At first, I did not think I was going to like the movie - the shocking first scene at the cotton mill left me wondering how I was going to love Mr. Thornton . . . which is rather crucial. <insert big sigh> I love Mr. Thornton.


Are you looking at that photo? Oh, the piercing eyes! the brooding! the anger! the tension! the frustrations and the agony! The movie is worth seeing just for the scene pictured above. "Look back, look back at me."

Beautifully filmed, the movie has an amazing cast of supporting characters. Mrs. Thornton has the deepest, most textured voice I have ever heard. I would love to listen to her read the book aloud. She hates Margaret. Hates her.
The sister is a riot and I could never figure out what she did all day? Was there anyone in town for her to hang out with?


North and South overall reminds me a lot of Pride and Prejudice, but with a much darker and more romantic feel. It also claims what must be the best period drama kiss on screen. The last scene in the bus station is utterly perfect. It is so satisfying to have a decent kiss when the lead characters finally get their acts together and profess their love (I'm looking at you Pride and Prejudice with the walking proposal that does not even merit subsequent hand holding!). The movie is one of those must own it and re-watch many times kind of film. So go, order it now!



BBC’s SUMMARY: Set against the backdrop of Victorian England’s industrial north, it follows the fortunes of Margaret Hale, one of 19th century literature’s most original heroines.

Played by Daniela Denby-Ashe, Margaret is a privileged, middle class southerner who is forced to settle in the northern town of Milton. [She] takes instant offence to the town and its people. She becomes terribly lonely and hates the dirt, noise and lack of civilisation, blaming their new way of life for her mother’s ailing health.

Her distaste for the town and its people extends to handsome and charismatic cotton mill owner John Thornton, (Richard Armitage), whom she believes epitomises everything she dislikes about the North.

However, Margaret gradually begins to settle in Milton. Her social conscience awakens and she befriends some of the local mill workers, learning about their poverty and workplace struggles.

As events conspire to throw Margaret and Thornton together, the two spirited characters have to overcome their repressed physical attraction for one another and conquer prejudices of class and circumstance.

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

If you love Jane Austin . . . .


If you love Jane Austin, you will adore Cranford. Bryan and I spent the last two nights watching all five episodes and I am telling you to run, not walk, your fingers over to the computer and buy the series. It is that good.

Based on several books and short stories by Elizabeth Gaskell, the production is superb, the cast is simply amazing and the script writer did a fabulous job of weaving all of the story lines into a cohesive whole.

I laughed, I gasped out loud, I wept - wept, not cried and most of all, I loved every minute of it.

Trust me. You will want to own this one.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Twilight Movie - The Review


The long anticipate Twilight movie is finally in theaters and after seeing it twice (dork) I feel like I can give a pretty detailed review. Summit, Catherine, Stephanie, if you are reading this - take note: I can help you make this a better movie with just a few simple changes. Call me.

The first time I saw the movie was at the midnight showing. Our local theater had four showings at midnight. We ended up with a group of 6 women and a whole theater full of teenage girls. I have to say that I was nervous all day to see the movie. I was worried it would not live up to my expectations and I was nervous that the actors would not be able to capture the overall feeling of the book. I could tell that most of the people in the theater felt the same way. There was a lot of nervous laughter and giggling which turned to shrieks by the second showing.

After the show my initial reaction was "it was soooo rushed!" I enjoyed the movie but was on the fence as to whether or not I really liked it. It reminded me of the new version of Pride and Prejudice with Keira Knightly. I love like watching the new version, the music is gorgeous, I enjoy the different, gritty feel of the movie as opposed to the perfect standard (BBC with Colin Firth) but it misses a lot of my favorite moments like the friendship between Jane and Elizabeth and it has one of the worst lines in movie adaptation history - "well then, your hands are cold," and a very obvious wig on Keira. Gag.

Then, I saw Twilight again with 23 women and a theater full of teenage girls. And now I love it. Is it cheesy at times? Campy? Yes. Are the special effects laughable? Yes. Does it cut out a lot of the book? Of course. Is it difficult to adapt a beloved book to film - Yes (notable exceptions: BBC Pride and Prejudice, but they had 5 hours!, Stardust, The Princess Bride and The Color Purple).

Here's what I loved:

I loved the music. Buy the soundtrack. I love the scenery, the Cullen's home and Bella's house.


I want to move to Oregon - even with the rain. I loved the biology scene when Edward first smells Bella's scent. I love the kiss, though it is much steamier than the book and Bella was not in her undies in the book.


I love the prom - the kiss on the neck? . . . sigh. I loved Jacob even though his hair is obviously a wig. I hope he is drinking protein shakes and taking growth hormones to prepare him for New Moon!


I love Edward. Edward. Edward. Holy crap, Rob Pattinson is a beautiful man when he showers (don't get me started about what he looks like in his interviews). Does he wear more make-up than me in the film? Yes. Does it matter? No. I though Rob did a pretty amazing job with the role of Edward with a few glaring exceptions.


Rob's performance is the most impressive in the quiet scenes and the close-ups. In several interviews, Rob mentions that the scene in Port Angeles was the hardest for him to film. Trying to exit a Volvo in his poofy hair, pea coat and eyeliner and then deliver a glare that would scare five grown men, was evidently difficult to achieve. I thought he actually nailed that scene. He looked something like this:


Where Rob stumbled was when I could see the Rob slip through into the Edward. His look when he is sucking the venom out of Bella's arm sent the whole theater into giggles. I also did not like the constipated expression he had on his face during the scene where the bad vamps show up on the baseball field. Edward is supposed to be really strong and there were times when Rob looks frail - even in little things like leaning his hands against the rocks on either side of Bella. I can totally see how he pulled his groin the first time he tried to lift Kristen Stewart and I'm actually looking forward to seeing that outtake on the DVD. Overall though, I give him a big thumbs up. He dazzled me, and that's important.

Note to Summit. The whole glitter thing was just lame-o (if it is true that Lucas films people were responsible for that, they should be spanked) and please make Rob shave his chest. Note to Rob: push ups (though I understand he lost about 30 pounds prior to filming by working out and not eating. Lean proteins Rob - go talk to Cam).

After the first showing, I was disappointed with Kristen Stewart. She looks like Bella to me, but I felt like she was so emotionless for half of the movie and I never felt like she was in love with Edward. The eye fluttering and the stammering got on my nerves after a while and I could not remember her ever smiling! I found this shot of her on set which CLEARLY shows that she is capable of looking happy.


Then, I watched the movie again and focused more on her performance. I can tell that she feels like Bella is never really comfortable around Edward. I thought her performance much more nuanced the second time. That being said, there are certain lines that she delivered like she was bored - most notably the line in the woods where she says "I feel like you are going to disappear." I felt like Edward got to the point where he was lighthearted about their blossoming relationship (the jumping on her truck scene and in the parking lot with the sunglasses), but Bella never really got there.

She came the closest in the scene where Edward honks his horn for her and she almost smiles, and in Edward's bedroom. I guess overall, she just focused much more on the impossibility of their relationship and I wanted to see a bit more of that small period of time between Port Angeles and the baseball scene where Bella is growing more confident in the possibility of a relationship with him.


The supporting cast is great! I loved Eric, Jessica, Angela and Mike. They added some wonderful humor. I loved Charlie - I thought their father/daughter relationship was perfectly portrayed and he had some of the best scenes. I know some have complained about Bella not cooking for him, but I didn't miss it and they needed the diner scenes to move the bad vamps story along.

Speaking of the bad vamps - loved them too. The added scenes fit well and really added to the feel of the movie. When they cast the movie, I was not sure about Laurent, but he was great. James wears a seriously lame wig, but his chest more than makes up for it. Great lines for the bad vamps.


The Cullens: Alice is adorable and really perfect for her role. I loved her pointed little foot as she pitched in the baseball scene. Emmett and Esme are also perfect and I really liked the cooking scene where Emmett waves a knife at her. Dr Cullen got the worst of the white face paint - someone put it on with a trowel.


Jasper is unintentionally hysterical. He has one expression the entire movie - wide bugged eyes and pursed lips - here are some tame examples that did not make the final cut.


Julie said he looked like Beaker.


Nola thought he looked more like Edward Scissorhands.


I just thought he looked silly. Except in the baseball scene (my favorite scene in the movie). In that scene he had some sweet baseball bat tricks. I wish that scene were longer.

Rosalie was my least favorite casting choice so I was anxious to see if she could pull it off with make-up and wardrobe. Sadly, not so much. I thought she did a great job with the acting portion, but she just does not fit the book's description of Rosalie at all. The actual actress, Nikki Reed is beautiful in real life and clearly, not overweight.


But, make her a blond,


and stick her next to tiny size 0 Kristen Stewart and she looks pudgy and kind of forgettable. It's kind of like how Catherine Zeta-Jones looked heavy in Chicago only because she was dancing next to skeletal twig person Renee.


Overall I thought they did a pretty good job bringing the book to film. Do I want to see it again? Yes. Will I buy the DVD? Of course.

However, I think with a few small changes and an additional 10 minutes they would have had a much better film. Special effects aside, I missed the banter about Edward's immortality and Bella's mortality - "breakfast time for the human, watch me hunt" and Edward tasting the pizza as examples. But most of all, I missed the meadow. I wanted to see that first time when she touches his hand and he runs his nose along her jaw and listens to her heart. The biggest failure of the film to me was the lack of the slow, tense build-up in Edward and Bella's relationship. I missed the tentativeness of them admitting their attraction to each other. The film was not convincing in showing them going from I hate you on the field trip to I love you in the forest.It just did not do justice to the romance in the book. Imagine the film with just a few more minutes added to the forest scene where Bella would reach out and touch his face for the first time before telling him she loves him and he would do the same and then say something about how he does not know if he is strong enough to be close to her. Sigh again.

So, should you see it? Absolutely. But see it twice before you decide how you feel.


PS - This review made me laugh (language warning)

Monday, September 29, 2008

Lost in Austen

What is THIS and why did I not know about it?! Has anyone seen it? Thoughts?

Mrs. Bennett - ooooh, I love this actress!


Mr Darcy - he's no Colin Firth, but I'd like to see how he plays the role.


Elizabeth - I think she's the new bond girl.

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Movie Reviews

I recently read and loved the book Stardust by Neil Gaiman. We finally bought the movie at Target and it is brilliant!! The movie is every bit as good as the book with perfect casting (look for Ricky Gervais , Mark Strong and Rupert Everett). I loved the humor (the dead brothers are a riot) and the movie has the best sword fight I have ever seen. Definitely worth seeing for the whole family (I'd give it a PG-13 rating).

Go and see Mama Mia with a group of your very best girlfriends. We saw it on our Twilight outing with 11 of us together and it was hysterical! I seriously wanted to climb into the screen (the shots of the Greek islands are gorgeous) and I had to restrain myself from singing along to every song! Meryl Streep was so good and her singing was really impressive (she stole the show). Pierce Brosnan is the only miscast in the film - he cannot hold a tune at all!

We had a large number of Pride and Prejudice fans in our group, so there was a collective sigh of "Mr. Darcy" as he came on screen. Here is a completely gratuitous shot of Colin Firth in my favorite all-time movie.



Friday, March 28, 2008

Movie Reviews

Here are two of our latest Netflicks movies which I would not recommend.

I thought I would like this film because of the cast and I admit it had some funny moments. But, I found myself constantly leaning over to Bryan and asking "what is going on"? It was . . . pointless. Here is a great review:
For all Anderson’s pleasing, refreshing auteur tendencies, the overwhelming feeling delivered by ‘The Darjeeling Limited’ is of frustration, déjà vu and little progression.

This is a foreign film that again, I thought I'd really enjoy, but instead I found it to be really slow - the little girl is adorable though. It was very predictable but I did enjoy all the discussion about cooking a great food.

Friday, March 7, 2008

Movie Reviews

I have been waiting for this movie to come out on DVD for a long time. Though I am grateful for anything "Austin" that makes it to the big screen, I was disappointed in this movie. I liked Anne Hathaway as Jane, and from the extras on the DVD, she obviously did her homework. But, the movie just never convinced me that this portrayal of her life could possibly be true. Here is a great excerpt of a review:

"Embracing every Austen trope, the story includes a couple’s hatred for each other that turns into affection, a wealthy old woman who tries to control her heir’s marriage, class struggle, and the ongoing pressure to marry well. But watching Becoming Jane is the ultimate tease. All the elements are in place – the beautiful windswept countryside, the handsome rebel, the headstrong lady – but they don’t fit into place. It’s Austen without the Austen. The love story isn’t believable, the complications are forced, and worst of all, I barely cared about who Jane ended up with. I even started to sympathize with Mr. Wisley (Fox), the awkward suitor with a large bank account representing all that Jane despises: marrying for money not love. I found myself wishing that Jane would choose him just so the movie would end."

Ditto.

Another excellent review.
http://www.breakpoint.org/listingarticle.asp?ID=6868